SCOTUS Rejects Higher Bar for Majority-Group Discrimination Claims

In a unanimous ruling, the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States sided with a heterosexual woman in a case about employment discrimination against a majority group, or people who are not part of a historically marginalized group. This decision unifies standards for all discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

The case involved an Ohioan named Marlean Ames, who alleged she was passed over for promotions and later demoted in favor of gay colleagues with less experience or education.  Ames sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prevents employment discrimination based on protected classes like race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.


Lower courts had dismissed her claim under a stricter standard commonly used against majority-group plaintiffs, which required her to show unusual “background circumstances” that would suggest reverse discrimination.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court dismissed the use of the “background circumstances” requirement for majority-group plaintiffs.


Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote for the court, “Title VII’s disparate treatment provision draws no distinctions between majority-group plaintiffs and minority-group plaintiffs.” This means that courts cannot apply a different, or stricter, legal standard for plaintiffs simply because they belong to a majority group. Discrimination protections apply equally to all individuals.


In a concurring opinion for the court, Justice Clarence Thomas discussed how it can be difficult to identify who is a member of the “majority.”


He wrote, “Women, for example, make up the majority in the United States as a whole, but not in some states and counties. Similarly, women make up the majority of employees in certain industries, such as teaching and nursing, but the minority in other industries, such as construction.”


Employers must now apply the same legal standards to all claims, regardless of the plaintiff’s group identity. With the “background circumstance” rule gone, all employees are entitled to the same standard under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, prohibiting discrimination based on a protected class. Discrimination prevention training for managers and a thorough review of employment decisions and any discrimination claims are critical for remaining compliant under Title VII.

Recent Posts

A statue of a horse outside triangle park in Downtown Lexington
By Lockaby PLLC August 21, 2026
Two new DOL opinion letters clarify when employee travel is an ordinary commute and when it becomes compensable work time under the FLSA. Read on to learn more.
By Lockaby PLLC August 6, 2026
Due diligence helps buyers identify any hidden liabilities that could affect the value of the business. Read our blog to learn about five common liabilities.
Understanding Disparate Impact in 2026
By Lockaby PLLC July 28, 2026
In today’s video, Abby explains disparate impact under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and recent developments from the EEOC and DOJ.
Trees, fencing, and grass in Kentucky
By Lockaby PLLC July 28, 2026
The U.S. Department of Labor recently released its 2026 agency rule list. Read our blog for an overview on some of the most notable items on the list for employers
A man in front of Rupp Arena with copy overlaying the image saying
By Lockaby PLLC July 21, 2026
Matt explains what earnouts are, why they are used in M&A transactions, and what should be considered before agreeing to one. Watch our YouTube video to learn more!
A street curving towards the back ground in downtown Lexington, Kentucky
By Lockaby PLLC July 16, 2026
What makes a good internal investigation, and how should employers conduct them? Read this blog to learn more about internal investigations in the workplace.
Water running over limestone rocks in Lexington, Kentucky
By Lockaby PLLC June 30, 2026
Summer in Kentucky brings hot and humid days. Every workplace is different, but employers should consider incorporating heat safety into their workplace policies.
The courthouse in downtown Lexington, Kentucky against a blue sky
By Lockaby PLLC June 25, 2026
The Supreme Court has been asked to review a case that may have serious implications on employment discrimination claims. Are you an employer in Kentucky? Read more!
Abby Wearden, Lockaby Law Logo, and text saying AI in Hiring and Recruiting in Lexington, KY
By Lockaby PLLC June 17, 2026
In this video, we offer practical insights on navigating AI in the hiring and recruiting process for employers in Kentucky and beyond.
Looking up at a green tree with leaves and pine cones and a blue sky
January 2, 2026
The Department of Labor (DOL) regularly investigates businesses for compliance with federal employment laws. Read on to learn what to do when the DOL comes knocking.
Show More