Congress Reintroduces the Workforce Mobility Act

In 2023, Senators Chris Murphy (D-CT) and Todd Young (R-IN) reintroduced the Workforce Mobility Act for a fourth time. The bill had been previously introduced in 2018, 2019, and 2021, but it was stalled each time, never making it to a committee vote.

The Workforce Mobility Act prohibits individuals from entering into non-compete agreements, and it voids current non-compete agreements. The bill has a couple of agreements, and it voids current non-compete agreements. The bill has a couple of exceptions, including the sale of a business and the dissolution of a partnership.


If enacted, the Workforce Mobility Act would require employers to post and maintain provisions of the act in a conspicuous place where all employees or potential employees can access the information.


The Act would also give the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Labor (DOL) enforcement authority, and it would provide a private right of action for an employee to bring an enforcement action against an employer for a violation of the law. The bill would also allow state attorneys general to bring claims against employers for violations of the Workforce Mobility Act.


In June of 2025, Senators Murphy and Young reintroduced the Act once again—this time, against the backdrop of last year’s FTC Rule banning non-competes, which was ultimately challenged and set aside by a federal court in Texas.

The 2025 version of the Workforce Mobility Act has not yet been released, but Senators Murphy and Young continue to advocate for a federal ban on non-compete agreements.


Senator Murphy emphasized that non-competes trap low-wage workers, suppress wages, and harm entrepreneurship, urging Congress to codify the FTC’s proposed ban. Echoing that sentiment, Senator Young called non-competes a barrier to growth, innovation, and worker freedom and framed the bill as a way to unlock opportunity by letting workers apply their skills where they’re most needed.


John Lettieri, President and CEO of the Economic Innovation Group (EIG), called the Workforce Mobility Act a no-cost, pro-worker, pro-growth reform that removes a major barrier to opportunity. He stated that non-compete clauses suppress wages, block innovation, and limit worker mobility, arguing that ending them will boost entrepreneurship and make the economy more competitive.


EIG’s support is echoed by a broad coalition of medical associations, policy think tanks, business groups, and employers, including the American College of Emergency Physicians, Small Business Majority, and Veeva Systems.

As lawmakers continue to push for a permanent federal ban on non-competes, employers should stay informed on how federal and state-level changes could impact their contracts and hiring practices.


Stay ahead of the curve—evaluate your restrictive covenants and consult counsel to ensure your workforce strategy aligns with emerging legal trends.


Recent Posts

Pedestrian walkway connecting to building over a street in downtown Lexington, Kentucky
December 17, 2025
A shareholder or operating agreement is not extra paperwork. It is a core governance document that reduces risk, preserves relationships, and protects the business.
A sunny day with horse statues in the foreground, a field, a treeline, and a blue sky.
December 10, 2025
Whistleblower and qui tam claims play an important role in helping the United States government uncover fraud and protect taxpayer dollars. Learn more in this post!
Tall blue building behind square limestone building in downtown Lexington, KY.
December 3, 2025
Corporate governance is a set of rules, relationships, and processes that direct how a company is managed. Good governance is a blueprint for long-term success.
Sun shining through green tree leaves.
September 24, 2025
In a recent press release, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has made it clear that religious accommodations in the workplace are under sharper scrutiny than ever. Through lawsuits, settlements, and public statements, the agency is signaling that employers should expect more aggressive enforcement of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits workplace discrimination. In the past 200 days, the EEOC has stepped up its enforcement of Title VII’s religious protections. These actions have spanned over many different contexts.
Show More