Congress Reintroduces the Workforce Mobility Act

In 2023, Senators Chris Murphy (D-CT) and Todd Young (R-IN) reintroduced the Workforce Mobility Act for a fourth time. The bill had been previously introduced in 2018, 2019, and 2021, but it was stalled each time, never making it to a committee vote.

The Workforce Mobility Act prohibits individuals from entering into non-compete agreements, and it voids current non-compete agreements. The bill has a couple of agreements, and it voids current non-compete agreements. The bill has a couple of exceptions, including the sale of a business and the dissolution of a partnership.


If enacted, the Workforce Mobility Act would require employers to post and maintain provisions of the act in a conspicuous place where all employees or potential employees can access the information.


The Act would also give the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Labor (DOL) enforcement authority, and it would provide a private right of action for an employee to bring an enforcement action against an employer for a violation of the law. The bill would also allow state attorneys general to bring claims against employers for violations of the Workforce Mobility Act.


In June of 2025, Senators Murphy and Young reintroduced the Act once again—this time, against the backdrop of last year’s FTC Rule banning non-competes, which was ultimately challenged and set aside by a federal court in Texas.

The 2025 version of the Workforce Mobility Act has not yet been released, but Senators Murphy and Young continue to advocate for a federal ban on non-compete agreements.


Senator Murphy emphasized that non-competes trap low-wage workers, suppress wages, and harm entrepreneurship, urging Congress to codify the FTC’s proposed ban. Echoing that sentiment, Senator Young called non-competes a barrier to growth, innovation, and worker freedom and framed the bill as a way to unlock opportunity by letting workers apply their skills where they’re most needed.


John Lettieri, President and CEO of the Economic Innovation Group (EIG), called the Workforce Mobility Act a no-cost, pro-worker, pro-growth reform that removes a major barrier to opportunity. He stated that non-compete clauses suppress wages, block innovation, and limit worker mobility, arguing that ending them will boost entrepreneurship and make the economy more competitive.


EIG’s support is echoed by a broad coalition of medical associations, policy think tanks, business groups, and employers, including the American College of Emergency Physicians, Small Business Majority, and Veeva Systems.

As lawmakers continue to push for a permanent federal ban on non-competes, employers should stay informed on how federal and state-level changes could impact their contracts and hiring practices.


Stay ahead of the curve—evaluate your restrictive covenants and consult counsel to ensure your workforce strategy aligns with emerging legal trends.


Recent Posts

One half with a typewriter, rotary phone and notebook. The other half laptop, phone, and tablet
By Lockaby PLLC • October 28, 2026
Dolly Parton's 9 to 5 was released over 40 years ago, but it is a great reminder for modern employers about what can happen when workplace problem goes unaddressed.
Abby Wearden in front of building with text religious accommodations and artificial intelligence
By Lockaby PLLC • October 27, 2026
Are employees able to ask for religious accommodations from using artificial intelligence at work? Our YouTube video discusses this and employer obligations
Picture of a red traffic light with a brick building and blue sky in the background.
By Lockaby PLLC • October 22, 2026
Butterball agreed. to pay $230,000 in an ADA settlement with the EEOC. What can employers learn from this case? Read our blog to find out! Questions? Contact us!
Abigail Wearden in front of a building, Title: What is a Performance Improvement Plan?
By Lockaby PLLC • October 12, 2026
Performance improvement plans can help employers address performance problems. What should employers consider before introducing a PIP?
Horse statue with fountain in the background
By Lockaby PLLC • October 2, 2026
Payroll errors don't have to be intentional to create significant liability. What can employers learn from DoorDash's recent settlement with New York City?
Street with trees and brick buildings
By Lockaby PLLC • September 25, 2026
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals shifts the focus in religious accommodations cases from process to motive. Read our blog to learn more!
Man with glasses speaking, text in background
By Lockaby PLLC • September 23, 2026
A purchase agreement turns the framework of an M&A transaction into a binding contract between the parties. Watch this video to learn the ins and outs!
Brick exterior of a house with decorative rails around a porch
By Lockaby PLLC • September 18, 2026
Have you ever wondered how M&A financing works? Read our latest blog to understand the difference between cash, debt, and equity financing in M&A transactions.
Matt Lockaby discussing the parts of the letter of intent for a merger or acquisition.
By Lockaby PLLC • September 16, 2026
What is the Letter of Intent? Watch our latest YouTube video where Matt Lockaby breaks down this important document found in every M&A or business transaction.
Stonework on a building done in limestone
By Lockaby PLLC • September 1, 2026
For businesses, using AI in the workplace is common. Employers need to know what to include in an AI policy for their workplace. Read our blog to learn more.
Show More